The recent passage of the climate/IRA bill really is a solid accomplishment for our side. The dynamics have shifted, still a stream not a river, as a result of Dobbs. Kos was backed up by a lot of fancy polling and a great new ad campaign aimed at positioning Democrats as the defenders of freedom. I don’t have a link but it should be available here or maybe YouTube. ![]() “We are the Freedom Party.” The Republican ethos of reversing hard won freedoms is THE issue in this election. ![]() As for Research 2000, the lawyers will soon take over, as Daily Kos will be filing suit within the next day or two.At Netroots Nation tonight in Pittsburgh Markos Moulitsas did a fantastic job of framing the 2022 election - the next 70 or so days - and a strategy for success. Soon, we'll have a new pollster (or pollsters) to work with, helping us to fulfill our vision of surveying races and issues that are often overlooked by the traditional media and polling outfits. As difficult as it has been to learn that we were victims of that fraud, our commitment to accuracy and the truth is far more important than shielding ourselves from cheap shots from the Right. But ultimately, this episode validates the reason why we released the internal numbers from Research 2000 - and why every media outlet should do the same from their pollster without full transparency of results, this fraud would not have been uncovered. Sure, our friends on the Right will get to take some cheap shots, and they should take advantage of the opportunity. I can't express enough my gratitude to Mark, Michael, and Jonathan for helping bring this to light. I didn't trust Research 2000 more than I trusted SUSA (given their solid track record), but I did trust them. In fact, just last week, in an email debate about robo-pollsters, I had a senior editor at a top DC-based political publication tell me that he'd "obviously" trust Research 2000 more than any automated pollsters, such as SurveyUSA. Louis Post-Dispatch, the Bergen Record, and the Reno Gazette-Journal. Among its clients the last two years have been KCCI-TV in Iowa, WCAX-TV in Vermont, WISC-TV in Wisconsin, WKYT-TV in Kentucky, Lee Enterprises, the Concord Monitor, The Florida Times-Union, WSBT-TV/WISH-TV/WANE-TV in Indiana, the St. I want to feel stupid for being defrauded, but fact is Research 2000 had a good reputation in political circles. I hereby renounce any post we've written based exclusively on Research 2000 polling. I ask that all poll tracking sites remove any Research 2000 polls commissioned by us from their databases. While the investigation didn't look at all of Research 2000 polling conducted for us, fact is I no longer have any confidence in any of it, and neither should anyone else. Research 2000 was delivered a copy of the report early Monday morning, and though they quickly responded and promised a full response, once again the authors of the report heard nothing more. At one point, they claimed they couldn't deliver them because their computers were down and they had to work out of a Kinkos office. That was two weeks ago, and despite repeated promises to provide us that data, Research 2000 ultimately refused to do so. Early in this process, I asked for and they offered to provide us with their raw data for independent analysis - which could potentially exculpate them. Meanwhile, Research 2000 has refused to offer any explanation. We were defrauded by Research 2000, and while we don't know if some or all of the data was fabricated or manipulated beyond recognition, we know we can't trust it. Based on the report of the statisticians, it's clear that we did not get what we paid for. We contracted with Research 2000 to conduct polling and to provide us with the results of their surveys. ![]() This is serious business, and I wasn't going to bury it over a weekend. I held publication of the report until today, because I didn't want to partake in a cliche Friday Bad News Dump. By the end of last week, they had accomplished the first two items on that list. I also offered to run the results on Daily Kos provided that they 1) fully documented each claim in detail, 2) got that documentation peer reviewed by disinterested third parties, and 3) gave Research 2000 an opportunity to respond. Since the moment Mark Grebner, Michael Weissman, and Jonathan Weissman approached me, I took their concerns seriously and cooperated fully with their investigation. I have just published a report by three statistics wizards showing, quite convincingly, that the weekly Research 2000 State of the Nation poll we ran the past year and a half was likely bunk.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |